Code : B002NVRPM0
Category : ,
Rating :
See more images Dyson DC23 TurbineHead Canister Vacuum : Here
Dyson DC23 TurbineHead Canister Vacuum
Dyson DC23 TurbineHead Canister Vacuum
Search Result
Product Details
- Amazon Sales Rank: #92907 in Home
- Color: Iron/Metallic Blue
- Brand: Dyson
- Model: 18299-01
- Released on: 2010-01-25
- Dimensions: 15.90" h x 23.90" w x 13.60" l, 25.00 pounds
Features
- Compact canister vacuum with Level 3 Root Cyclone technology ensures powerful, consistent suction
- Air-driven TurbineHead brush bar is ideal for cleaning medium and short pile carpets and can be turned off for hard floors.
- Lifetime HEPA filter with Bactisafe screen that traps and kills bacteria, mold and allergens on contact
- Telescopic Wrap System allows the hose and wand to be compressed
- Measures 13.9 x 19.3 x 11.9 inches (HxWxD); 5-year warranty
- Compact canister vacuum with Level 3 Root Cyclone technology ensures powerful, consistent suction
- Air-driven TurbineHead brush bar is ideal for cleaning medium and short pile carpets and can be turned off for hard floors.
- Lifetime HEPA filter with Bactisafe screen that traps and kills bacteria, mold and allergens on contact
- Telescopic Wrap System allows the hose and wand to be compressed
- Measures 13.9 x 19.3 x 11.9 inches (HxWxD); 5-year warranty
Product Description
The Dyson DC23 Turbinehead is a bagless canister vacuum for medium and short pile carpets. Contains Dyson's most efficient cyclone technology for capturing microscopic dust. Turbinehead brush bar is for carpets and switches off for hard floors. Lifetime washable HEPA filter traps microscopic allergens.
Customer Reviews
Most helpful customer reviews
381 of 390 people found the following review helpful.
Good Suction, Expensive
By D. Timmerman
Despite the fact that the Dysons have never been a top pick on Consumer Reports (even though they consistently rate high for brand reliability), I went ahead and purchased the DC23 Turbinehead from Target for $399.As people often find when purchasing a new vacuum, they pick up a lot of dust and dirt in the carpet that their old vacuum left behind. Mainly because most older vacuums just lose suction even if you replace the filters and maintain all the parts. I find that to be frustrating and disappointing, and that's mainly one of the reasons that I went with the Dyson -- I'm hoping it lives up to their tagline (Never Loses Suction).The suction on the DC23 is good. The turbine head attachment spins quickly and pulls in cat litter and other little particles in the carpet. I was revolted by the giant thick dust ball I picked up in just one bedroom with the first use. The DC23 does it's job well. So here's the run down of what I like and don't like about this model:Likes-Excellent suction, vacuums well. Easily picks up all the cat hair and cat litter I throw at it.-Small, light weight and portable-Beautifully designed -- it's shocking to look at this model next to all the Hoovers, Dirt Devils, and Bissells of the world that look like something straight out of the 80's. Also glad they are moving away from the yellow plastic!-Easy to empty dust bin, no bags-Because of the small head, this vacuum can go where most uprights cannot -- under beds and tables.Dislikes-It's a little expensive, however, will be well worth it if it actually lasts a long time without losing suction-Storage is a little flimsy -- the hose just sort of hangs out off of the vacuum and the head attachment very loosely attaches to the canister base.
370 of 388 people found the following review helpful.
good, not great
By Mike
I read a whole bunch of reviews prior to purchasing a DC23 last year because of the price difference, and was taken by the raves about how much the new vac picked up on purchase. The most negative stuff I found related to the quality of plastic used, the awkward wrapping of the hose for storage, maybe a few comments about the head not standing on its own, things I didn't think would be that big a deal. I paid the premium price based on the marketing of the unit (an engineer doing things properly), thinking that if it didn't live up to the hype it would've been noted online. I expected to be delighted by this vacuum. I wasn't.After just about 6 months use:Plus- the canister does collect amazing volumes of stuff from floors, and it is cool to observe it doing so, but I note that it is now cleaning up after itself, so to speak, and so it isn't another brands shortcoming... Still, noteworthy performance.- I find the power head and floor attachments to be pretty good.- the power cord is really good at rewinding. No seriously, they got this much better than my last vacuum. Not too strong that it could be dangerous, but strong enough to be efficient. I like it a lot and I hope it works like this for the life of the product.Overall does vacuuming like a vacuum.Minus- I empty the canister every single use, as it looks quite full which is not something I ever worried about previously. I can live with that, but I've never seen anyone comment on how awkward emptying the canister into a garbage can is. The entire base kinda flops down and usually releases a cloud of dust no matter how carefully you open it. I live in an apt with a light colored carpet so when I empty it I invariably reinstall the canister and re-vacuum the area I just did to clean up the dust.- The clear plastic is kinda "cheap", as some have identified, being more lightweight than my last vacuum, but more troubling to me is that the hose is very lightweight too. I feel I have to be careful not to step on it lest I crush it permanently. This vacuum cost almost twice as much as lesser models with better hardware (@$600 in Canada, compared to @$300 for competitor sale models), so I'm not impressed with this level of quality.- The power head doesn't stand on its own, as mentioned, and it turns out that this IS annoying to me. Canister vacuums have done this for more than 20 years that I've been aware of, and the dyson engineers dropped or forgot this because they didn't do analysis of how people would use the product...? Or dropping the handle to the ground was a perverse operational cost/benefit decision of some type? Also the lack of a power switch on the handle turns out to be ergonomically annoying too...- The hose, as someone else mentioned here, comes off the unit clockwise instead of being centrally located. I imagine this improves the airflow, probably a good thing for suction. But, together with the narrow wheelbase, it is occasionally awkward to manoeuvre (counterclockwise in tight quarters) and sometimes makes the unit tippy compared to my last unit. I actually unhooked the hose from a support so it would manoeuvre better.- I almost never do the wrapping of the hose on the base for storage as shown in the marketing pics because the hose is so rigid and time consuming to do "proply". And then if you try and move the unit with the hose wrapped and head on it is quite awkward. PITA ergonomically. I just put it away with the wand compressed (good feature) and power head on and the hose laying everywhere.- This lead to my next beef, which is I bought some accessories including a "soft brush" to do blinds. Made of the same dyson plastic, functional but not impressive, and I observed at the time that storing these accessories was gonna be a nuisance, as they don't fit on the unit. They naturally ended up on the floor of my closet and a few times the lightweight hose was left on top of them. The bristles warped from the weight of the hose in a short time and can't be straightened. Again, reference the cost of these things, and I am disappointed that the nylon in the brush is cheap and insubstantial. I've never had accessories do this. I believe they have used the wrong brush material for accessories of this type.Bottom line: an ok product for its core function, charging too much for the value provided in my view, and not nearly as substantive qualitatively as I would've thought a consumer good at this price point would be. I rate it a 3, by which I mean I might not buy another one of this vintage, quality and price; I wouldn't put it out of the running, but I'd look closely at alternatives. Dyson needs to address the ergonomics and quality values of this product to perform up to its marketing hype.
92 of 101 people found the following review helpful.
Works well if you do not have fully carpeted floors
By Mallard Rider
If you live in a residence that is predominantly hardwood floor, this is one of the better vacuums - no make, that the best. The turbine-powered airbrush works well for moderately shaggy rugs and floors, and while it is not a cheap canister, it is money well spent. I have never sucked out so much dust. Dyson has always scored a very high mark for design and this is no exception. It is quite easy to dump all the dust out from the bin, and I prefer canister vacuums since they're easy to put away.Get the Motorhead if you have fully carpeted floors. For me the Turbinehead is more than enough.
{ 0 comments... read them below or add one }
Post a Comment